Nihilized Being ($-1-1-1)

Ontology (1)

The Ontology is Logik. As stated in Pure Thinking, the A(bsolute) speaks about itself, the (agent-)B(eing). But this Being is of no determination.

Epistemology (1)

The Epistemology is Absolute Negation:

• It is able to contract/dissolve anything (…) into Being (with no determination).

Teleology (1)

The Teleology of (Nihilized) Being is Becoming Nothing:

• Pure Thinking is (retroactively) awared of its indeterminateness (=> Nothing).
• Nothing is free of determinateness.

One possible definition of Nothing is self-awareness of Being.

(Being)    (opens up horizon)    (Nothing)
   1   <=========================>   1
             (self-awared)


| Being ...         |
| Being [Being ...] |  (Becoming)
| Nothing           |

The dialectic movement, Becoming, is the genesis of (pure?) difference.

The full $-1-1-1 is as following:

(perfect)         (dictate)         (Being)     (opens up horizon)    (Nothing)     
    1       <==================>       1       <==================>       1
                   (proxy)                        (self-awared)     

Other ways

Natural language

In the English sentence “There is nothing.”, we insert a pause in between:

[There is ...] = [Nothing]

Proto Set Theory

Determination of Being can be quasi-formalized as a “proto-set”:

$$Being = \{A, B, C, ..., Being, ...\}$$

We can therefore find the symptom of this determinate Being as a proto-set: Being [Being]. This special element negates the determination of Being internally. Similar reasoning can be applied to Universal Ideologies like Freedom, Equality, and so on.

Möbius strip

Accent Shift

Witness Martin Heidegger.

Communist Manifesto

I shall say the very self-awareness of indeterminateness, the Absolute Negation that dissolves every present and positive determinations, is Freedom à la Karl Marx:

$$\text{The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.}$$